Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Geopacific Resources Limited (GPR) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$141M

PriceA$0.0310
Fair ValueA$0.0245
Upside-21.0%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

Geopacific Resources Limited (GPR) currently trades at A$0.0310, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.0245 — implying the stock looks roughly 21.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Geopacific Resources Limited engages in the exploration and development of gold deposits in Papua New Guinea. The company holds a 100% interest in the Woodlark gold project covering an area of approximately 529 square kilometers, located in Woodlark Island, Papua New Guinea. Geopacific Resources Limited was incorporated in 1986 and is headquartered in Claremont, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Newmont Corporation (NEMCL) +67% Zijin Mining Group (601899) +30% Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) +60% Barrick Mining Corporation (B) +90% Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (SII) -49% AngloGold Ashanti plc (AU) +104%

Frequently asked questions

Is Geopacific Resources Limited (GPR) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.0245 versus a price of A$0.0310 — about −21% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of GPR?
Our 21-model fair value for Geopacific Resources Limited is A$0.0245 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.0310.
What is the quality score of GPR?
Geopacific Resources Limited has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.