Greenlane Renewables Inc (GRNWF) Fair Value & Analysis
Industrials · US · Market cap $24.9M
Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026
Analysis
Greenlane Renewables Inc (GRNWF) currently trades at $0.1630, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.1500 — implying the stock looks roughly 8.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).
About the company
Greenlane Renewables Inc. provides biogas desulfurization and upgrading systems and services worldwide. Its systems produce clean; renewable natural gas from organic-waste sources, including landfills, sugar mills, dairy farms, wastewater, and food waste; and suitable for either injections into the natural gas grid or for direct use as commercial vehicle fuel. The company offers water wash, pressure swing adsorption, and membrane separation technologies, as well as biogas desulfurization. It markets and sells its upgrading systems under the Greenlane Biogas brand. The company was formerly known as Creation Capital Corp. and changed its name to Greenlane Renewables Inc. in June 2019. Greenlane Renewables Inc. was founded in 1986 and is headquartered in Burnaby, Canada.
Open the full interactive analysis →
Similar stocks
Frequently asked questions
Is Greenlane Renewables Inc (GRNWF) undervalued?
What is the fair value of GRNWF?
What is the quality score of GRNWF?
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.
Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.