Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Minerals 260 Limited (MI6) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$1.8B

PriceA$0.9550
Fair ValueA$0.2900
Upside-69.6%
Quality91/100
Evidence: Low Range A$0.2200 – A$0.3700

Analysis

Minerals 260 Limited (MI6) currently trades at A$0.9550, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.2900 — implying the stock looks roughly 69.6% overvalued today. We read business quality at 91/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Minerals 260 Limited engages in the exploration and evaluation of mineral resources in Australia. The company explores for gold, palladium, nickel, copper, and rare earths elements, as well as precious and battery-related metals. The company holds 100% interest in the Bullabulling Gold Project located in south-west of Kalgoorlie, Western Australian in the Eastern Goldfields; and the Moora project covering an area of 371 square kilometers located in Julimar Mineral Province, Western Australia. The company was incorporated in 2021 and is based in West Perth, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Fresnillo plc (FRES) +23% Valterra Platinum Limited (ANGPY) -27% Hecla Mining Company (HCL) -41% Impala Platinum Holdings (IMPUY) +315% Northam Platinum Holdings (NPTLF) -84% Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A. (BVN) -11%

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.