MNS Fair Value & Analysis
Consumer Cyclical · PL · Market cap 104M PLN
Fair value as of: Jul 10, 2026
From 25 valuation models · updated 31 days ago
Fair value updated Jul 10, 2026, revised from 110.06 PLN to 77.70 PLN (−29.4%) since Jun 24, 2026. Share price −8.0% over the past month.
A solid business, screening 41% undervalued on our models.
What matters now
- The price is below even our cautious bear case (58.28 PLN). The market is more pessimistic than our downside scenario.
- Solid quality (64/100) at a price below fair value, the discount is the argument here, not the business quality.
Price vs Fair Value (5 years)
White line = price, green steps = our fair value per fiscal year, dashed = 300-day average. As of Jul 10, 2026.
How to read this chart
60‑month range 38.20 PLN – 153.45 PLN · fair‑value band 58.28 PLN – 97.13 PLN · the 55.00 PLN price screens below the 77.70 PLN fair value. Green steps = our fair value per fiscal year (point-in-time, no hindsight). Dashed = 300-day average. As of Jul 10, 2026.
Analysis
MNS (MNS) currently trades at 55.00 PLN, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 77.70 PLN, implying the stock looks roughly 41.3% undervalued today. The Quality Score stands at 64/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high), always confirm before acting.
Net debt stands at 4.2M PLN. The stock trades on a trailing P/E of 6.6. Fundamentals as of Jul 10, 2026
Our scenario range runs from 58.28 PLN (bear case) to 97.13 PLN (bull case); at 55.00 PLN, the current price sits below that range. Bear and bull are the same models run on conservative and optimistic assumptions (margins, growth, valuation multiples), so a plausible valuation range, not a price target. The share trades about 48% below its 52-week high and 15% above its 52-week low. For context, the median of 10 Consumer Cyclical peers we cover trades at 41% fair-value upside, at 41%, MNS screens cheaper than that median.
Fair Value models
Each model estimates fair value its own way; the Fair Value above is the evidence-weighted blend. Evidence (0–100) measures how completely this model’s inputs are available: well-fed models carry more weight in the blend. The spread across models is intentional, each one stresses a different value driver; dividend models, for instance, come out structurally low when payout is small.
All 25 models by family
Widest divergence: Growth Earnings (195.29 PLN) versus Dividend Discount (6.09 PLN). Highest evidence: Growth DCF (80).
Key figures & financial health
Figures from reported company fundamentals · as of Jul 10, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.
Quality Score breakdown
Of which business quality 61 · Market factors (momentum, volatility) 23
Non-valuation factor families (profitability, growth, cashflow, financial strength, momentum …), each academically grounded. Valuation itself sits in the Fair Value and is deliberately excluded here to avoid double-counting.
Revenue & earnings trend
FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years
MNS reported revenue of 1.4B PLN in FY2025 versus 1.1B PLN in FY2021, a compound +5.4%/yr. Reported net income was 8.6M PLN in FY2025, compounding −20.5%/yr from FY2021.
Watch MNS: get an alert when its fair value changes →
Peer Group
Consumer Discretionary · 3559 stocks
How this stock ranks against its sector: the green marker is this stock, the band is the typical 25–75% peer range, and the tick is the median. (Industry “Specialty Retailers” was too small, so the broader sector is used.)
Valuation Multiples vs Consumer Discretionary median · lower = cheaper
Snowflake
Five quick dimensions, each 0 to 100: VALUE (fair-value potential), FUTURE (revenue growth), PAST (return on equity), HEALTH (low debt), DIVIDEND (yield). Green = this stock, grey = typical sector peer.
Values & ESG
Does this company touch areas you may want to avoid? The classification is inferred from sector and industry.
ESG scores are not available for this stock yet. Values and ESG data are contextual and can differ between providers.
Similar stocks
10 more Specialty Retailers stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 10, 2026).
| Stock | Price | Fair Value | vs Fair Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| WLCON WLCON | 5.65 PHP | 4.63 PHP | -18% |
| iFamiySC Co 114840 | 7,920 KRW | 22,355 KRW | +182% |
| Toyota Motor Corporation TMN | 3,052 MXN | 4,134 MXN | +35% |
| Hyundai Motor Company 005380 | 425,000 KRW | 616,918 KRW | +45% |
| Maruti Suzuki India Limited MARUTI | ₹13,803 | ₹8,236 | -40% |
| Kia Corporation 000270 | 145,000 KRW | 350,994 KRW | +142% |
| Bajaj Auto Limited BAJAJAUTO | ₹10,381 | ₹4,730 | -54% |
| Hyundai Mobis Co 012330 | 482,000 KRW | 678,420 KRW | +41% |
| Falabella S.A FALABELLA | 5,875 CLP | 8,880 CLP | +51% |
| Cencosud S.A CENCOSUD | 2,040 CLP | 2,516 CLP | +23% |
Compare MNS with another stock
Price, fair value, quality and upside side by side.
Explore undervalued stocks
More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →
Frequently asked questions
Is MNS overvalued or undervalued?
What is the fair value of MNS?
What is the quality score of MNS?
What is the net profit margin of MNS?
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data, nothing guessed.
Track MNS and try Pro for 14 days
One email gets you 14 days of full Pro (review alerts, the 35,000+ stock screener, the diversification check) plus the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks. No card, cancel anytime.
Zero risk: nothing is ever charged. After 14 days you decide whether to stay.