Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Danakali Limited (SBMSF) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · US · Market cap $19.5M

Price$0.0600
Fair Value$0.0565
Upside-5.9%
Quality89/100
Evidence: Low Range $0.0484 – $0.0646

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

Danakali Limited (SBMSF) currently trades at $0.0600, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.0565 — implying the stock looks roughly 5.9% overvalued today. We read business quality at 89/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Danakali Limited, together with its subsidiaries, focuses on the exploration and development company in the Australia and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It is also involved in investment in exploration. The company was formerly known as South Boulder Mines Ltd. and changed its name to Danakali Limited in June 2015. Danakali Limited was incorporated in 2001 and is headquartered in North Perth, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Corteva, Inc (CTVA) -49% Nutrien Ltd (NTR) -23% Qinghai Salt Lake Industry Co (000792) -28% CF Industries Holdings (C1FI34) +51% Yara International ASA (YAR) +86% ICL Group (ICL) -51%

Frequently asked questions

Is Danakali Limited (SBMSF) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of $0.0565 versus a price of $0.0600 — about −6% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of SBMSF?
Our 21-model fair value for Danakali Limited is $0.0565 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is $0.0600.
What is the quality score of SBMSF?
Danakali Limited has a Quality Score of 89/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.