Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Strategic Minerals Plc (SMNLF) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · US · Market cap $194M

Price$0.0688
Fair Value$0.0283
Upside-58.8%
Quality91/100
Evidence: Low

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Strategic Minerals Plc (SMNLF) currently trades at $0.0688, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.0283 — implying the stock looks roughly 58.8% overvalued today. We read business quality at 91/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Strategic Minerals Plc engages in the exploration, development, and operation of mining projects. The company operates the Cobre mine in New Mexico, which sells magnetite for use in the cement, fertilizer, dense media/medium, paint pigment, water jet cutting, ballast, magnet, toner, coal cleaning, and landscaping markets. It also holds 50% interest in the Redmoor tin/tungsten project in Cornwall, the United Kingdom. The company was incorporated in 2010 and is based in London, United Kingdom.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Strategic Minerals Plc (SMNLF) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of $0.0283 versus a price of $0.0688 — about −59% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of SMNLF?
Our 21-model fair value for Strategic Minerals Plc is $0.0283 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is $0.0688.
What is the quality score of SMNLF?
Strategic Minerals Plc has a Quality Score of 91/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.