Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Sonetel AB (SONE) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · SE · Market cap 43.2M SEK

Pricekr 5.20
Fair Valuekr 1.97
Upside-62.1%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range kr 1.29 – kr 2.66

Fair value as of: Jun 25, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Sonetel AB (SONE) currently trades at kr 5.20, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is kr 1.97 — implying the stock looks roughly 62.1% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

About the company

Sonetel AB (publ) provides internet-based subscription service for business communication in Sweden. The company offers virtual local phone numbers, AI-powered communications, voice response, and call recording services; and feedback tools that help small businesses gain insights from customer calls. It provides business communication, customer service software, team communication, SIP trunking, cloud IVR, AI meeting minutes and blog writer, and API services. The company was incorporated in 1994 and is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Sonetel AB (SONE) undervalued?
As of Jun 25, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of kr 1.97 versus a price of kr 5.20 — about −62% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of SONE?
Our 21-model fair value for Sonetel AB is kr 1.97 (as of Jun 25, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is kr 5.20.
What is the quality score of SONE?
Sonetel AB has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.