Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Venari Minerals NL (VMS) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$15.1M

PriceA$0.0910
Fair ValueA$0.0264
Upside-71.0%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range A$0.0264 – A$0.0355

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Venari Minerals NL (VMS) currently trades at A$0.0910, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.0264 — implying the stock looks roughly 71.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Venari Minerals NL engages in the exploration and development of mineral resource properties in Australia and the United States. The company explores for critical and precious metals, silver, lithium, and gold deposits. Its flagship project is Red Mountain Lithium Project located in Nevada. Venari Minerals NL was formerly known as Astute Metals NL and changed its name to Venari Minerals NL in September 2025. Venari Minerals NL was incorporated in 1988 and is based in Sydney, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Venari Minerals NL (VMS) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.0264 versus a price of A$0.0910 — about −71% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of VMS?
Our 21-model fair value for Venari Minerals NL is A$0.0264 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.0910.
What is the quality score of VMS?
Venari Minerals NL has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.