1555 (1555) Fair Value & Analysis

Energy · Market cap HK$84.7M

1 1555 1555 · HK

PriceHK$0.0280

Fair ValueHK$0.0566

Upside+102.0%

Quality36/100

Watch 1555 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.0566 – HK$0.0566

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 15 valuation models · updated today

Share price −13.8% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.0280 – HK$0.0706 · the HK$0.0280 price screens below the HK$0.0566 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1555 (1555) currently trades at HK$0.0280, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0566 — implying the stock looks roughly 102.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 36/100 (below-average quality), in the Energy sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1555 generated revenue of HK$706M at a net margin of -71.2%. Revenue declined 21.9% year over year. Net debt stands at HK$3.0B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$706M

Revenue growth (YoY) -21.9%

Net margin -71.2%

Free cash flow HK$255M FY2025

Operating margin -6.2%

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0400

More key figures

Net debt HK$3.0B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1555 reported revenue of HK$688M in FY2025 versus HK$1.0B in FY2021, a compound −9.3%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$490M in FY2025.

Revenue −9.3%/yr

FY21 HK$1.0B

FY22 HK$1.4B

FY23 HK$1.0B

FY24 HK$898M

FY25 HK$688M

Net income

FY21 −HK$338M

FY22 HK$2.4B

FY23 −HK$158M

FY24 −HK$329M

FY25 −HK$490M

Is 1555 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Oil & Gas E&P stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
CNOOC Limited 600938	¥30.54	¥28.25	-7%
COP COP	$119.92	$88.68	-26%
COPH34 COPH34	R$50.30	R$38.44	-24%
YCP YCP	€95.32	€91.80	-4%
Canadian Natural Resources Limited CNQ	$41.79	$69.05	+65%
EOG Resources, Inc EOG	$134.90	$130.19	-3%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Energy stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1555 (1555) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0566 versus a price of HK$0.0280 — about +102% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1555?

Our model-based fair value for 1555 is HK$0.0566 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.0280.

What is the quality score of 1555?

1555 has a Quality Score of 36/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1555 (1555)?

1555 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$706M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1555?

The net profit margin of 1555 is about -71.2%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.