1673 (1673) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$471M

1 1673 1673 · HK

PriceHK$0.2950

Fair ValueHK$0.0500

Upside-83.1%

Quality47/100

Watch 1673 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Low Range HK$0.0400 – HK$0.0600

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 2 valuation models · updated today

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.1960 – HK$0.3500 · fair‑value band HK$0.0400 – HK$0.0600 · the HK$0.2950 price screens above the HK$0.0500 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1673 (1673) currently trades at HK$0.2950, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0500 — implying the stock looks roughly 83.1% overvalued today. We read business quality at 47/100 (below-average quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1673 generated revenue of HK$386M at a net margin of -7.0%. Revenue declined 22.6% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -6.6%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$19.0M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$386M

Revenue growth (YoY) -22.6%

Net margin -7.0%

Return on equity -6.6%

Free cash flow −HK$27.8M FY2025

Operating margin -11.8%

More key figures

Net cash HK$19.0M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1673 reported revenue of HK$430M in FY2025 versus HK$497M in FY2021, a compound −3.6%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$11.5M in FY2025.

Revenue −3.6%/yr

FY21 HK$497M

FY22 HK$324M

FY23 HK$529M

FY24 HK$448M

FY25 HK$430M

Net income

FY21 HK$18.0M

FY22 −HK$364M

FY23 −HK$51.2M

FY24 −HK$18.7M

FY25 −HK$11.5M

Is 1673 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Specialty Industrial Machinery stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
1GEV 1GEV	€967.60	€212.97	-78%
GE Vernova Inc GEV	$963.33	$315.30	-67%
SIEGY SIEGY	$155.06	$89.54	-42%
SMAWF SMAWF	$307.12	$176.28	-43%
SMNS SMNS	C$31.76	C$23.45	-26%
SIE SIE	€269.80	€161.17	-40%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1673 (1673) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0500 versus a price of HK$0.2950 — about −83% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1673?

Our model-based fair value for 1673 is HK$0.0500 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.2950.

What is the quality score of 1673?

1673 has a Quality Score of 47/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1673 (1673)?

1673 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$386M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1673?

The net profit margin of 1673 is about -7.0%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.