1675 (1675) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · Market cap HK$4.2B

1 1675 1675 · HK

PriceHK$4.47

Fair ValueHK$3.80

Upside-15.0%

Quality51/100

Watch 1675 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$3.53 – HK$4.23

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price −19.3% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$4.45 – HK$12.23 · fair‑value band HK$3.53 – HK$4.23 · the HK$4.47 price screens above the HK$3.80 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1675 (1675) currently trades at HK$4.47, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$3.80 — implying the stock looks roughly 15.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 51/100 (solid quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1675 generated revenue of HK$6.3B at a net margin of 1.8%. Revenue grew 1.4% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 1.6%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$1.5B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$6.3B

Revenue growth (YoY) +1.4%

Net margin 1.8%

Return on equity 1.6%

Free cash flow HK$341M FY2025

P/E ratio 32.2

More key figures

Operating margin 10.6%

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.2200

Dividend yield 1.1%

EPS growth (YoY) -48.7%

Net cash HK$1.5B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1675 reported revenue of HK$6.3B in FY2025 versus HK$6.9B in FY2021, a compound −2.2%/yr. Reported net income was HK$114M in FY2025, compounding −38.3%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −2.2%/yr

FY21 HK$6.9B

FY22 HK$7.7B

FY23 HK$7.9B

FY24 HK$6.6B

FY25 HK$6.3B

Net income −38.3%/yr

FY21 HK$786M

FY22 HK$832M

FY23 HK$533M

FY24 HK$545M

FY25 HK$114M

Is 1675 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Software - Application stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
SAP SE SAPP34	R$769.00	R$120.02	-84%
Salesforce, Inc CRM	$150.12	$299.82	+100%
Uber Technologies, Inc UBER	$70.71	$90.28	+28%
Shopify Inc SHOP	$107.98	$32.94	-69%
ServiceNow, Inc NOW	$93.01	$76.44	-18%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc CDNS	$379.06	$80.41	-79%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Technology stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1675 (1675) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$3.80 versus a price of HK$4.47 — about −15% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1675?

Our model-based fair value for 1675 is HK$3.80 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$4.47.

What is the quality score of 1675?

1675 has a Quality Score of 51/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1675 (1675)?

1675 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$6.3B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1675?

The net profit margin of 1675 is about 1.8%, meaning it keeps roughly 1.8% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 1675 pay a dividend?

1675 currently shows a dividend yield of about 1.08% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.