1765 (1765) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Defensive · Market cap HK$1.1B

1 1765 1765 · HK

PriceHK$0.1310

Fair ValueHK$0.0931

Upside-28.9%

Quality41/100

Watch 1765 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.0725 – HK$0.1162

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 26 valuation models · updated today

Share price −10.3% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.1260 – HK$0.2550 · fair‑value band HK$0.0725 – HK$0.1162 · the HK$0.1310 price screens above the HK$0.0931 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1765 (1765) currently trades at HK$0.1310, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0931 — implying the stock looks roughly 28.9% overvalued today. We read business quality at 41/100 (below-average quality), in the Consumer Defensive sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1765 generated revenue of HK$3.9B at a net margin of 17.9%. Revenue declined 3.3% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 7.1%. Net debt stands at HK$1.5B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$3.9B

Revenue growth (YoY) -3.3%

Net margin 17.9%

Return on equity 7.1%

Free cash flow HK$393M FY2025

P/E ratio 12.8

More key figures

Operating margin 26.9%

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0600

EPS growth (YoY) +92.6%

Net debt HK$1.5B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1765 reported revenue of HK$4.0B in FY2025 versus HK$2.3B in FY2021, a compound +14.3%/yr. Reported net income was HK$385M in FY2025, compounding −10.7%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +14.3%/yr

FY21 HK$2.3B

FY22 HK$3.0B

FY23 HK$3.6B

FY24 HK$3.7B

FY25 HK$4.0B

Net income −10.7%/yr

FY21 HK$606M

FY22 HK$445M

FY23 HK$210M

FY24 HK$610M

FY25 HK$385M

Is 1765 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Education & Training Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
New Oriental Education & Technology Group EDUN	966.48 MXN	895.77 MXN	-7%
9901 9901	HK$36.30	HK$4.84	-87%
TAL Education Group T1AL34	R$4.89	R$0.9200	-81%
Graham Holdings GHC	$1,147	$1,170	+2%
Laureate Education, Inc LAUR	$33.82	$33.05	-2%
Covista Inc CVSA	$119.28	$137.46	+15%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Defensive stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1765 (1765) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0931 versus a price of HK$0.1310 — about −29% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1765?

Our model-based fair value for 1765 is HK$0.0931 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1310.

What is the quality score of 1765?

1765 has a Quality Score of 41/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1765 (1765)?

1765 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$3.9B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1765?

The net profit margin of 1765 is about 17.9%, meaning it keeps roughly 17.9% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.