Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1825 (1825) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$44.8M

1 1825 1825 · HK
PriceHK$1.08
Fair ValueHK$2.65
Upside+145.4%
Quality48/100
Watch 1825 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: High Range HK$2.30 – HK$2.96

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 16 valuation models · updated today

Share price +54.3% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$1.90 HK$0.6500 Fair Value HK$2.65 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.6500 – HK$1.90 · fair‑value band HK$2.30 – HK$2.96 · the HK$1.08 price screens below the HK$2.65 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1825 (1825) currently trades at HK$1.08, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$2.65 — implying the stock looks roughly 145.4% undervalued today. We read business quality at 48/100 (below-average quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1825 generated revenue of HK$383M at a net margin of -4.4%. Revenue declined 34.5% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -59.0%. Net debt stands at HK$94.6M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$383M
Revenue growth (YoY) -34.5%
Net margin -4.4%
Return on equity -59.0%
Free cash flow HK$63.2M FY2025
Operating margin -0.5%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0300
EPS growth (YoY) +3,345%
Net debt HK$94.6M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1825 reported revenue of HK$478M in FY2025 versus HK$371M in FY2021, a compound +6.5%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$6.1M in FY2025.

Revenue +6.5%/yr
FY21 HK$371M
FY22 HK$456M
FY23 HK$623M
FY24 HK$571M
FY25 HK$478M
Net income
FY21 −HK$33.3M
FY22 −HK$38.8M
FY23 HK$19.9M
FY24 −HK$18.4M
FY25 −HK$6.1M

Is 1825 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Apparel Manufacturing stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB HMB kr 164.90 kr 165.47 +0%
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL $376.43 $423.69 +13%
Moncler S.p.A MONC €50.90 €50.69 -0%
Gildan Activewear Inc GIL $57.04 $34.84 -39%
LPP SA LPP 21,720 PLN 18,670 PLN -14%
Levi Strauss & Co LEVI $23.61 $16.83 -29%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1825 (1825) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$2.65 versus a price of HK$1.08 — about +145% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1825?
Our model-based fair value for 1825 is HK$2.65 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$1.08.
What is the quality score of 1825?
1825 has a Quality Score of 48/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1825 (1825)?
1825 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$383M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1825?
The net profit margin of 1825 is about -4.4%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.