2100 (2100) Fair Value & Analysis

Communication Services · Market cap HK$1,000M

2 2100 2100 · HK

PriceHK$0.3600

Fair ValueHK$0.2100

Upside-41.7%

Quality48/100

Watch 2100 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Low Range HK$0.1100 – HK$0.3100

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 3 valuation models · updated today

Share price −29.4% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.3450 – HK$0.8000 · fair‑value band HK$0.1100 – HK$0.3100 · the HK$0.3600 price screens above the HK$0.2100 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2100 (2100) currently trades at HK$0.3600, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.2100 — implying the stock looks roughly 41.7% overvalued today. We read business quality at 48/100 (below-average quality), in the Communication Services sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 2100 generated revenue of HK$610M at a net margin of -12.3%. Revenue grew 12.7% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -4.9%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$491M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$610M

Revenue growth (YoY) +12.7%

Net margin -12.3%

Return on equity -4.9%

Free cash flow −HK$63.8M FY2025

Operating margin -11.1%

More key figures

EPS (TTM) HK$0.2100

EPS growth (YoY) -69.7%

Net cash HK$491M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2100 reported revenue of HK$610M in FY2025 versus HK$884M in FY2021, a compound −8.8%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$75.1M in FY2025.

Revenue −8.8%/yr

FY21 HK$884M

FY22 HK$939M

FY23 HK$783M

FY24 HK$545M

FY25 HK$610M

Net income

FY21 HK$26.4M

FY22 HK$10.2M

FY23 −HK$31.5M

FY24 −HK$28.0M

FY25 −HK$75.1M

Is 2100 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Electronic Gaming & Multimedia stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Konami Group KNM	£20,200	£68.84	-100%
NetEase, Inc NTES	$125.82	$153.10	+22%
Nintendo Co NTDOY	$11.18	$15.81	+41%
Electronic Arts Inc EA	$202.97	$77.82	-62%
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc TTWO	$210.46	$63.78	-70%
Zhejiang Century Huatong Group 002602	¥14.56	¥26.62	+83%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Communication Services stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2100 (2100) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.2100 versus a price of HK$0.3600 — about −42% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 2100?

Our model-based fair value for 2100 is HK$0.2100 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.3600.

What is the quality score of 2100?

2100 has a Quality Score of 48/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 2100 (2100)?

2100 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$610M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 2100?

The net profit margin of 2100 is about -12.3%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.