Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

8275 (8275) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$88.3M

8 8275 8275 · HK
PriceHK$0.0920
Fair ValueHK$0.0902
Upside-2.0%
Quality29/100
Watch 8275 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.0626 – HK$0.1086

Fair value as of: Jul 3, 2026

From 1 valuation models · updated today

Share price −8.0% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.1630 HK$0.0890 Fair Value HK$0.0902 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.0890 – HK$0.1630 · fair‑value band HK$0.0626 – HK$0.1086 · the HK$0.0920 price screens above the HK$0.0902 fair value. As of Jul 3, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

8275 (8275) currently trades at HK$0.0920, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0902 — implying the stock looks roughly 2.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 29/100 (below-average quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Trailing-twelve-month revenue stands at HK$20.1M. Revenue declined 85.0% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -20.0%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$11.7M. Fundamentals as of Jul 3, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$20.1M
Revenue growth (YoY) -85.0%
Net margin -115%
Return on equity -20.0%
Free cash flow −HK$5.0M FY2025
Operating margin -133%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0100
EPS growth (YoY) -76.9%
Net cash HK$11.7M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 3, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

8275 reported revenue of HK$20.1M in FY2025 versus HK$147M in FY2021, a compound −39.1%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$23.1M in FY2025.

Revenue −39.1%/yr
FY21 HK$147M
FY22 HK$135M
FY23 HK$140M
FY24 HK$159M
FY25 HK$20.1M
Net income
FY21 −HK$37.8M
FY22 −HK$26.8M
FY23 HK$8.4M
FY24 −HK$31.2M
FY25 −HK$23.1M

Is 8275 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 3, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD $0.4415 $0.5700 +29%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260 520,000 KRW 268,469 KRW -48%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668 ¥4.65 ¥17.35 +273%
TopBuild Corp BLD 7,547 MXN 4,541 MXN -40%
000720 000720 127,800 KRW 55,602 KRW -56%
United Integrated Services Co 2404 1,195 TWD 1,681 TWD +41%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 8275 (8275) undervalued?
As of Jul 3, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0902 versus a price of HK$0.0920 — about −2% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 8275?
Our model-based fair value for 8275 is HK$0.0902 (as of Jul 3, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.0920.
What is the quality score of 8275?
8275 has a Quality Score of 29/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 8275 (8275)?
8275 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$20.1M (latest available figure, as of Jul 3, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 8275?
The net profit margin of 8275 is about -115.1%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.