Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C. (FSTA) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · GB · Market cap 346M GBX

Pricep7.22
Fair Valuep10.55
Upside+46.1%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range p10.21 – p17.81

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C. (FSTA) currently trades at p7.22, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is p10.55 — implying the stock looks roughly 46.1% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C. operates pubs and hotels in the United Kingdom. It operates through Managed Pubs and Hotels, and Tenanted Inns segments. The company also operates pubs operated by third parties under tenancy or lease agreements; Bel & The Dragon, Cotswold Inns & Hotels, and Lovely Pubs; and managed houses services. Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C. was founded in 1845 and is based in London, the United Kingdom.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C. (FSTA) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of p10.55 versus a price of p7.22 — about +46% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of FSTA?
Our 21-model fair value for Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C. is p10.55 (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is p7.22.
What is the quality score of FSTA?
Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C. has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.