Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Lord Resources Limited (LRD) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$2.7M

PriceA$0.0130
Fair ValueA$0.0126
Upside-3.0%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Lord Resources Limited (LRD) currently trades at A$0.0130, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.0126 — implying the stock looks roughly 3.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Lord Resources Limited engages in acquiring and exploring of mineral interests in Western Australia. It explores for gold, lithium, copper, nickel, precious metals, and energy. The company was formerly known as ENEABBA GAS LIMITED. Lord Resources Limited was incorporated in 2003 and is based in Mount Hawthorn, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

BHP Group (BHP) -43% Rio Tinto Group (RTNTF) -41% Grupo México, S.A. (GMBXF) -6% CMOC Group (CMCLY) -24% Vale S.A (VALEN) -96% Anglo American plc (AAUKF) -61%

Frequently asked questions

Is Lord Resources Limited (LRD) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.0126 versus a price of A$0.0130 — about −3% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of LRD?
Our 21-model fair value for Lord Resources Limited is A$0.0126 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.0130.
What is the quality score of LRD?
Lord Resources Limited has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.