Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Majestic Gold Corp (MJS) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · CA · Market cap C$125M

PriceC$0.1000
Fair ValueC$0.1100
Upside+10.0%
Quality80/100
Evidence: Medium Range C$0.0900 – C$0.1400

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Majestic Gold Corp (MJS) currently trades at C$0.1000, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is C$0.1100 — implying the stock looks roughly 10.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 80/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Majestic Gold Corp., a mining company, focuses on exploration, development, and operation of mining properties in China. The company primarily explores for gold ores. The company was incorporated in 1986 and is headquartered in Surrey, Canada.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Newmont Corporation (NEMCL) +26% Zijin Mining Group (601899) +30% Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) +60% Barrick Mining Corporation (B) +90% Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (SII) -49% AngloGold Ashanti plc (AU) +104%

Frequently asked questions

Is Majestic Gold Corp (MJS) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of C$0.1100 versus a price of C$0.1000 — about +10% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of MJS?
Our 21-model fair value for Majestic Gold Corp is C$0.1100 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is C$0.1000.
What is the quality score of MJS?
Majestic Gold Corp has a Quality Score of 80/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.