Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

SeaTwirl AB (STW) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · SE · Market cap 248M SEK

Pricekr 33.10
Fair Valuekr 14.37
Upside-56.6%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range kr 14.37 – kr 14.38

Fair value as of: Jun 25, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

SeaTwirl AB (STW) currently trades at kr 33.10, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is kr 14.37 — implying the stock looks roughly 56.6% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

SeaTwirl AB (publ), an energy technology company, develops and sells floating wind turbines. The company was founded in 2012 and is based in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaTwirl AB (STW) undervalued?
As of Jun 25, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of kr 14.37 versus a price of kr 33.10 — about −57% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of STW?
Our 21-model fair value for SeaTwirl AB is kr 14.37 (as of Jun 25, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is kr 33.10.
What is the quality score of STW?
SeaTwirl AB has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.