Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Tusker Minerals Ltd (TSK) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$12.3M

PriceA$0.0650
Fair ValueA$0.1463
Upside+125.0%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range A$0.1203 – A$0.1723

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Tusker Minerals Ltd (TSK) currently trades at A$0.0650, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.1463 — implying the stock looks roughly 125.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Tusker Minerals Ltd engages in the exploration and evaluation of mineral and metal projects in Southern Malawi. The company primarily explores for heavy rare earth elements, niobium, copper, and nickel. It holds 100% interests in the Machinga, Salambidwe, Ngala Hill, Tundulu, Mzimba, and the Karonga projects located in Malawi. Tusker Minerals Ltd was formerly known as DY6 Metals Limited. The company was incorporated in 2022 and is based in Perth, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Tusker Minerals Ltd (TSK) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.1463 versus a price of A$0.0650 — about +125% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of TSK?
Our 21-model fair value for Tusker Minerals Ltd is A$0.1463 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.0650.
What is the quality score of TSK?
Tusker Minerals Ltd has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.