Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1052 (1052) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$6.0B

1 1052 1052 · HK
PriceHK$3.61
Fair ValueHK$7.52
Upside+108.3%
Quality58/100
Evidence: Medium Range HK$5.46 – HK$9.40

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 23 valuation models · updated today

Share price −6.7% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$4.63 HK$3.34 Fair Value HK$7.52 Jun 2025 Jun 2026

12‑month range HK$3.34 – HK$4.63 · fair‑value band HK$5.46 – HK$9.40 · the HK$3.61 price screens below the HK$7.52 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1052 (1052) currently trades at HK$3.61, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$7.52 — implying the stock looks roughly 108.3% undervalued today. We read business quality at 58/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1052 generated revenue of HK$5.6B at a net margin of 9.5%. Revenue grew 3.9% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 5.7%. Net debt stands at HK$14.3B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$5.6B
Revenue growth (YoY) +3.9%
Net margin 9.5%
Return on equity 5.7%
Free cash flow HK$3.1B FY2025
P/E ratio 9.8
More key figures
Operating margin 26.1%
EPS (TTM) HK$0.2200
Dividend yield 6.0%
EPS growth (YoY) -49.8%
Net debt HK$14.3B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1052 reported revenue of HK$4.2B in FY2025 versus HK$3.9B in FY2021, a compound +2.1%/yr. Reported net income was HK$519M in FY2025, compounding −22.8%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +2.1%/yr
FY21 HK$3.9B
FY22 HK$3.6B
FY23 HK$4.7B
FY24 HK$3.9B
FY25 HK$4.2B
Net income −22.8%/yr
FY21 HK$1.5B
FY22 HK$453M
FY23 HK$765M
FY24 HK$657M
FY25 HK$519M

Is 1052 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Infrastructure Operations stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1052 (1052) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$7.52 versus a price of HK$3.61 — about +108% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1052?
Our model-based fair value for 1052 is HK$7.52 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$3.61.
What is the quality score of 1052?
1052 has a Quality Score of 58/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1052 (1052)?
1052 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$5.6B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1052?
The net profit margin of 1052 is about 9.5%, meaning it keeps roughly 9.5% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.
Does 1052 pay a dividend?
1052 currently shows a dividend yield of about 6.02% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.