1827 (1827) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$360M

1 1827 1827 · HK

PriceHK$0.9000

Fair ValueHK$0.6200

Upside-31.1%

Quality59/100

Watch 1827 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.4600 – HK$0.7700

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price +28.6% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.6700 – HK$1.15 · fair‑value band HK$0.4600 – HK$0.7700 · the HK$0.9000 price screens above the HK$0.6200 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1827 (1827) currently trades at HK$0.9000, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.6200 — implying the stock looks roughly 31.1% overvalued today. We read business quality at 59/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1827 generated revenue of HK$362M at a net margin of 3.1%. Revenue declined 0.4% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 7.4%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$140M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$362M

Revenue growth (YoY) -0.4%

Net margin 3.1%

Return on equity 7.4%

Free cash flow HK$112M FY2025

P/E ratio 30.0

More key figures

Operating margin 8.0%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0300

EPS growth (YoY) +3.1%

Net cash HK$140M FY2026

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2022 – FY2026 · reported fiscal years

1827 reported revenue of HK$362M in FY2026 versus HK$364M in FY2022, a compound −0.1%/yr. Reported net income was HK$11.2M in FY2026, compounding −18.4%/yr from FY2022.

Revenue −0.1%/yr

FY22 HK$364M

FY23 HK$463M

FY24 HK$494M

FY25 HK$403M

FY26 HK$362M

Net income −18.4%/yr

FY22 HK$25.4M

FY23 −HK$20.5M

FY24 −HK$12.6M

FY25 HK$10.6M

FY26 HK$11.2M

Is 1827 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Personal Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Rollins, Inc ROL	$47.10	$15.62	-67%
Service Corporation SCI	$73.16	$36.64	-50%
H&R Block, Inc HRB	$34.04	$78.83	+132%
Frontdoor, Inc FTDR	$71.87	$73.55	+2%
Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc BFAM	$61.54	$74.79	+22%
Fu Shou Yuan International Group FSHUF	$0.3800	$0.5500	+45%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1827 (1827) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.6200 versus a price of HK$0.9000 — about −31% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1827?

Our model-based fair value for 1827 is HK$0.6200 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.9000.

What is the quality score of 1827?

1827 has a Quality Score of 59/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1827 (1827)?

1827 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$362M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1827?

The net profit margin of 1827 is about 3.1%, meaning it keeps roughly 3.1% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.