Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1866 (1866) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · Market cap HK$11.2B

1 1866 1866 · HK
PriceHK$8.76
Fair ValueHK$14.35
Upside+63.8%
Quality46/100
Watch 1866 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Medium Range HK$10.76 – HK$17.93

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 16 valuation models · updated today

Share price −14.1% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$12.73 HK$5.39 Fair Value HK$14.35 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$5.39 – HK$12.73 · fair‑value band HK$10.76 – HK$17.93 · the HK$8.76 price screens below the HK$14.35 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1866 (1866) currently trades at HK$8.76, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$14.35 — implying the stock looks roughly 63.8% undervalued today. We read business quality at 46/100 (below-average quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1866 generated revenue of HK$25.4B at a net margin of 3.7%. Revenue grew 14.6% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 10.1%. Net debt stands at HK$16.4B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$25.4B
Revenue growth (YoY) +14.6%
Net margin 3.7%
Return on equity 10.1%
Free cash flow −HK$2.6B FY2025
P/E ratio 10.2
More key figures
Operating margin 5.9%
EPS (TTM) HK$0.4900
EPS growth (YoY) -56.5%
Net debt HK$16.4B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1866 reported revenue of HK$25.4B in FY2025 versus HK$17.0B in FY2021, a compound +10.5%/yr. Reported net income was HK$932M in FY2025, compounding −7.9%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +10.5%/yr
FY21 HK$17.0B
FY22 HK$23.1B
FY23 HK$23.5B
FY24 HK$23.1B
FY25 HK$25.4B
Net income −7.9%/yr
FY21 HK$1.3B
FY22 HK$1.3B
FY23 HK$1.2B
FY24 HK$1.5B
FY25 HK$932M

Is 1866 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Agricultural Inputs stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Corteva, Inc CTVA $77.46 $39.29 -49%
Nutrien Ltd NTR $68.50 $52.75 -23%
Qinghai Salt Lake Industry Co 000792 ¥30.69 ¥21.26 -31%
CF Industries Holdings C1FI34 R$577.43 R$978.53 +69%
Yara International ASA YAR kr 502.80 kr 695.65 +38%
ICL Group ICL $5.07 $2.88 -43%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Basic Materials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1866 (1866) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$14.35 versus a price of HK$8.76 — about +64% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1866?
Our model-based fair value for 1866 is HK$14.35 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$8.76.
What is the quality score of 1866?
1866 has a Quality Score of 46/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1866 (1866)?
1866 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$25.4B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1866?
The net profit margin of 1866 is about 3.7%, meaning it keeps roughly 3.7% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.