Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

9678 (9678) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · Market cap HK$5.0B

9 9678 9678 · HK
PriceHK$69.55
Fair ValueHK$8.61
Upside-87.6%
Quality32/100
Watch 9678 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$5.68 – HK$10.76

Fair value as of: Jul 3, 2026

From 1 valuation models · updated today

Share price −71.2% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$856.00 HK$69.55 Fair Value HK$8.61 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$69.55 – HK$856.00 · fair‑value band HK$5.68 – HK$10.76 · the HK$69.55 price screens above the HK$8.61 fair value. As of Jul 3, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

9678 (9678) currently trades at HK$69.55, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$8.61 — implying the stock looks roughly 87.6% overvalued today. We read business quality at 32/100 (below-average quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 9678 generated revenue of HK$1.2B at a net margin of -27.0%. Revenue grew 34.0% year over year. Fundamentals as of Jul 3, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$1.2B
Revenue growth (YoY) +34.0%
Net margin -27.0%
Free cash flow −HK$241M FY2025
Operating margin -3.6%
EPS (TTM) HK$-4.28

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 3, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2022 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

9678 reported revenue of HK$1.2B in FY2025 versus HK$601M in FY2022, a compound +26.3%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$327M in FY2025.

Revenue +26.3%/yr
FY22 HK$601M
FY23 HK$727M
FY24 HK$939M
FY25 HK$1.2B
Net income
FY22 −HK$366M
FY23 −HK$375M
FY24 −HK$452M
FY25 −HK$327M

Is 9678 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Software - Infrastructure stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 3, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Microsoft Corporation MSF €347.50 €211.04 -39%
MSFT MSFT 7,019 MXN 274.17 MXN -96%
Oracle Corporation ORCL $201.26 $43.29 -78%
Palantir Technologies Inc PTX €114.20 €17.96 -84%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc 5AP €231.80 €35.85 -85%
CrowdStrike Holdings CRWD C$53.33 C$13.07 -75%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Technology stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 9678 (9678) undervalued?
As of Jul 3, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$8.61 versus a price of HK$69.55 — about −88% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 9678?
Our model-based fair value for 9678 is HK$8.61 (as of Jul 3, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$69.55.
What is the quality score of 9678?
9678 has a Quality Score of 32/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 9678 (9678)?
9678 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$1.2B (latest available figure, as of Jul 3, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 9678?
The net profit margin of 9678 is about -27.0%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.