Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Cedar Woods Properties Limited (CWP) Fair Value & Analysis

Real Estate · AU · Market cap A$565M

PriceA$6.94
Fair ValueA$10.70
Upside+54.2%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range A$5.44 – A$14.36

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Cedar Woods Properties Limited (CWP) currently trades at A$6.94, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$10.70 — implying the stock looks roughly 54.2% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Real Estate sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Cedar Woods Properties Limited develops and invests in properties in Australia. It engages in the acquisition, development, marketing, and sale of housing lots, apartments, townhouses, and commercial properties in Western Australia, South Australia, Victoria, and Queensland. The company was incorporated in 1987 and is based in West Perth, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Cedar Woods Properties Limited (CWP) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$10.70 versus a price of A$6.94 — about +54% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of CWP?
Our 21-model fair value for Cedar Woods Properties Limited is A$10.70 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$6.94.
What is the quality score of CWP?
Cedar Woods Properties Limited has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.