Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Rank Progress S.A (RNK) Fair Value & Analysis

Real Estate · PL · Market cap 171M PLN

Price4.58 PLN
Fair Value11.44 PLN
Upside+150.1%
Quality91/100
Evidence: High Range 6.67 PLN – 15.76 PLN

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

Rank Progress S.A (RNK) currently trades at 4.58 PLN, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 11.44 PLN — implying the stock looks roughly 150.1% undervalued today. We read business quality at 91/100 (high quality), in the Real Estate sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Rank Progress S.A. invests in, develops, rents, and sells commercial real estate properties in Poland and internationally. It develops shopping and service centers; shopping malls; and residential and office buildings. The company was founded in 1997 and is based in Legnica, Poland.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Mitsubishi Estate Co (MITEY) +41% Mitsui Fudosan Co (MTSFF) +9% Henderson Land Development Company (HLDVF) -32% Swiss Prime Site AG (SPSN) -66% Central Pattana Public Company (CPNR) +7% SM Prime Holdings (SPHXF) +139%

Frequently asked questions

Is Rank Progress S.A (RNK) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of 11.44 PLN versus a price of 4.58 PLN — about +150% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of RNK?
Our 21-model fair value for Rank Progress S.A is 11.44 PLN (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is 4.58 PLN.
What is the quality score of RNK?
Rank Progress S.A has a Quality Score of 91/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.