Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Retailors Ltd (RTLS) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Il · Market cap 1.5B ILA

Price25.92 ILA
Fair Value29.80 ILA
Upside+15.0%
Quality94/100
Evidence: High Range 22.35 ILA – 37.24 ILA

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

Analysis

Retailors Ltd (RTLS) currently trades at 25.92 ILA, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 29.80 ILA — implying the stock looks roughly 15.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 94/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Retailors Ltd engages in the retail sale of footwear, sportswear and sports accessories, and leisure fashion through a chain of stores in Israel, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. It offers its products under the Nike, Foot Locker, and Converse brands. The company was incorporated in 2008 and is based in Bnei Brak, Israel. Retailors Ltd operates as a subsidiary of Fox-Wizel Ltd.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Industria de Diseño Textil, S.A (IDEXY) -24% The TJX Companies, Inc (TJX) -45% Fast Retailing Co (FRCOY) -62% Ross Stores, Inc (ROST) -50% NEXT plc (NXGPF) +9% Burlington Stores, Inc (BURL) -56%

Frequently asked questions

Is Retailors Ltd (RTLS) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of 29.80 ILA versus a price of 25.92 ILA — about +15% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of RTLS?
Our 21-model fair value for Retailors Ltd is 29.80 ILA (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is 25.92 ILA.
What is the quality score of RTLS?
Retailors Ltd has a Quality Score of 94/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.