Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1705 (1705) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Defensive · Market cap HK$268M

1 1705 1705 · HK
PriceHK$0.6600
Fair ValueHK$0.9000
Upside+36.4%
Quality80/100
Watch 1705 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: High Range HK$0.6800 – HK$1.13

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price +29.4% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.6600 HK$0.3339 Fair Value HK$0.9000 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.3339 – HK$0.6600 · fair‑value band HK$0.6800 – HK$1.13 · the HK$0.6600 price screens below the HK$0.9000 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1705 (1705) currently trades at HK$0.6600, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.9000 — implying the stock looks roughly 36.4% undervalued today. We read business quality at 80/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Defensive sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1705 generated revenue of HK$505M at a net margin of 3.4%. Revenue declined 1.2% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 11.4%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$23.9M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$505M
Revenue growth (YoY) -1.2%
Net margin 3.4%
Return on equity 11.4%
Free cash flow HK$69.1M FY2025
P/E ratio 16.8
More key figures
Operating margin 3.5%
EPS (TTM) HK$0.0500
EPS growth (YoY) -6.4%
Net cash HK$23.9M FY2026

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2022 – FY2026 · reported fiscal years

1705 reported revenue of HK$505M in FY2026 versus HK$468M in FY2022, a compound +1.9%/yr. Reported net income was HK$17.1M in FY2026, compounding +131.6%/yr from FY2022.

Revenue +1.9%/yr
FY22 HK$468M
FY23 HK$487M
FY24 HK$521M
FY25 HK$505M
FY26 HK$505M
Net income +131.6%/yr
FY22 HK$596K
FY23 HK$27.8M
FY24 HK$33.6M
FY25 HK$17.8M
FY26 HK$17.1M

Is 1705 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Food Distribution stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Sysco Corporation SYY $76.29 $37.61 -51%
US Foods Holding USFD $92.76 $54.78 -41%
Performance Food Group PFGC $100.74 $42.91 -57%
Jerónimo Martins, SGPS, S.A JRONF $23.70 $25.51 +8%
JMT JMT 75.00 PLN 91.29 PLN +22%
Bunzl plc BZLFY $16.51 $14.69 -11%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Defensive stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1705 (1705) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.9000 versus a price of HK$0.6600 — about +36% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1705?
Our model-based fair value for 1705 is HK$0.9000 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.6600.
What is the quality score of 1705?
1705 has a Quality Score of 80/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1705 (1705)?
1705 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$505M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1705?
The net profit margin of 1705 is about 3.4%, meaning it keeps roughly 3.4% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.