Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1891 (1891) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$174M

1 1891 1891 · HK
PriceHK$0.1740
Fair ValueHK$0.4700
Upside+170.1%
Quality61/100
Watch 1891 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: High Range HK$0.3600 – HK$0.7100

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 23 valuation models · updated today

Share price −9.4% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.2000 HK$0.1050 Fair Value HK$0.4700 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.1050 – HK$0.2000 · fair‑value band HK$0.3600 – HK$0.7100 · the HK$0.1740 price screens below the HK$0.4700 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1891 (1891) currently trades at HK$0.1740, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.4700 — implying the stock looks roughly 170.1% undervalued today. We read business quality at 61/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1891 generated revenue of HK$1.5B at a net margin of 1.0%. Revenue declined 13.2% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 4.5%. Net debt stands at HK$34.0M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$1.5B
Revenue growth (YoY) -13.2%
Net margin 1.0%
Return on equity 4.5%
Free cash flow HK$1.5M FY2025
P/E ratio 5.8
More key figures
Operating margin 0.8%
EPS (TTM) HK$0.0100
EPS growth (YoY) -56.4%
Net debt HK$34.0M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1891 reported revenue of HK$1.5B in FY2025 versus HK$1.4B in FY2021, a compound +0.6%/yr. Reported net income was HK$14.6M in FY2025, compounding −13.0%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +0.6%/yr
FY21 HK$1.4B
FY22 HK$1.4B
FY23 HK$1.3B
FY24 HK$1.7B
FY25 HK$1.5B
Net income −13.0%/yr
FY21 HK$25.5M
FY22 HK$2.4M
FY23 HK$8.5M
FY24 HK$25.5M
FY25 HK$14.6M

Is 1891 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Metal Fabrication stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
ATI Inc ATI $204.09 $36.39 -82%
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS $492.62 $82.57 -83%
Mueller Industries, Inc MLI $139.51 $120.61 -14%
Aurubis AG NDA €216.20 €116.94 -46%
Commercial Metals Company CMC $73.57 $28.97 -61%
China International Marine Containers (Group) Co 000039 ¥8.98 ¥6.57 -27%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1891 (1891) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.4700 versus a price of HK$0.1740 — about +170% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1891?
Our model-based fair value for 1891 is HK$0.4700 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1740.
What is the quality score of 1891?
1891 has a Quality Score of 61/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1891 (1891)?
1891 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$1.5B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1891?
The net profit margin of 1891 is about 1.0%, meaning it keeps roughly 1.0% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.