1965 (1965) Fair Value & Analysis

Real Estate · Market cap HK$50.7M

1 1965 1965 · HK

PriceHK$0.1310

Fair ValueHK$0.1414

Upside+7.9%

Quality61/100

Watch 1965 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.1164 – HK$0.1660

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 22 valuation models · updated today

Share price −8.4% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.1280 – HK$0.1860 · fair‑value band HK$0.1164 – HK$0.1660 · the HK$0.1310 price screens below the HK$0.1414 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1965 (1965) currently trades at HK$0.1310, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.1414 — implying the stock looks roughly 7.9% undervalued today. We read business quality at 61/100 (solid quality), in the Real Estate sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1965 generated revenue of HK$779M at a net margin of 3.0%. Revenue declined 2.2% year over year. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$342M. The stock trades on a trailing P/E of 1.9. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$779M

Revenue growth (YoY) -2.2%

Net margin 3.0%

Return on equity -296%

Free cash flow HK$51.5M FY2025

P/E ratio 1.9

More key figures

Operating margin 8.9%

EPS growth (YoY) -84.9%

Net cash HK$342M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1965 reported revenue of HK$779M in FY2025 versus HK$737M in FY2021, a compound +1.4%/yr. Reported net income was HK$23.0M in FY2025, compounding −20.7%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +1.4%/yr

FY21 HK$737M

FY22 HK$889M

FY23 HK$931M

FY24 HK$789M

FY25 HK$779M

Net income −20.7%/yr

FY21 HK$58.3M

FY22 HK$28.4M

FY23 −HK$134M

FY24 −HK$318M

FY25 HK$23.0M

Is 1965 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Real Estate - Diversified stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Mitsubishi Estate Co MITEY	$25.55	$35.90	+41%
Mitsui Fudosan Co MTSFF	$9.20	$13.56	+47%
Henderson Land Development Company HLDVF	$3.70	$2.53	-32%
Swiss Prime Site AG SPSN	CHF 130.90	CHF 71.28	-46%
Central Pattana Public Company CPNR	64.25 THB	84.32 THB	+31%
SM Prime Holdings SPHXF	$0.2801	$0.4700	+68%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Real Estate stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1965 (1965) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.1414 versus a price of HK$0.1310 — about +8% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1965?

Our model-based fair value for 1965 is HK$0.1414 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1310.

What is the quality score of 1965?

1965 has a Quality Score of 61/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1965 (1965)?

1965 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$779M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1965?

The net profit margin of 1965 is about 3.0%, meaning it keeps roughly 3.0% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.