Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

2559 (2559) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$2.5B

2 2559 2559 · HK
PriceHK$2.45
Fair ValueHK$2.26
Upside-7.8%
Quality54/100
Watch 2559 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: High Range HK$1.89 – HK$2.51

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price +116.8% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$4.23 HK$1.07 Fair Value HK$2.26 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$1.07 – HK$4.23 · fair‑value band HK$1.89 – HK$2.51 · the HK$2.45 price screens above the HK$2.26 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2559 (2559) currently trades at HK$2.45, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$2.26 — implying the stock looks roughly 7.8% overvalued today. We read business quality at 54/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 2559 generated revenue of HK$502M at a net margin of 25.8%. Revenue declined 43.6% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 9.3%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$1.3B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$502M
Revenue growth (YoY) -43.6%
Net margin 25.8%
Return on equity 9.3%
Free cash flow HK$23.1M FY2025
P/E ratio 16.3
More key figures
Operating margin -7.5%
EPS (TTM) HK$0.1300
EPS growth (YoY) +59.2%
Net cash HK$1.3B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2559 reported revenue of HK$489M in FY2025 versus HK$781M in FY2021, a compound −11.0%/yr. Reported net income was HK$126M in FY2025, compounding −48.0%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −11.0%/yr
FY21 HK$781M
FY22 HK$569M
FY23 HK$815M
FY24 HK$787M
FY25 HK$489M
Net income −48.0%/yr
FY21 HK$1.7B
FY22 −HK$188M
FY23 HK$300M
FY24 HK$1.0B
FY25 HK$126M

Is 2559 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Rental & Leasing Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
United Rentals, Inc URI $1,093 $378.08 -65%
Sunbelt Rentals Holdings SUNB $76.43 $38.17 -50%
AerCap Holdings AER $146.85 $301.51 +105%
Ayvens ALLDF $14.00 $15.71 +12%
Ryder System, Inc R $270.25 $204.91 -24%
Localiza Rent a Car S.A LZRFY $7.81 $7.21 -8%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2559 (2559) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$2.26 versus a price of HK$2.45 — about −8% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 2559?
Our model-based fair value for 2559 is HK$2.26 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$2.45.
What is the quality score of 2559?
2559 has a Quality Score of 54/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 2559 (2559)?
2559 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$502M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 2559?
The net profit margin of 2559 is about 25.8%, meaning it keeps roughly 25.8% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.