Aristocrat Leisure Limited (ARLUF) Fair Value & Analysis
Consumer Cyclical · US · Market cap $24.0B
Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026
Analysis
Aristocrat Leisure Limited (ARLUF) currently trades at $41.84, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $27.19 — implying the stock looks roughly 35.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).
About the company
Aristocrat Leisure Limited, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a gaming content and technology company in Australia and internationally. It operates through three segments: Aristocrat Gaming, Product Madness, and Aristocrat Interactive. The company designs, develops, assembles, distributes, sells, and services gaming content, platforms, and systems, including electronic gaming machines, casino management systems, and iLottery and free-to-play mobile games. It also offers product madness, a publisher in the social casino genre of free-to-play mobile games; aristocrat gaming, a regulated land-based gaming; and Aristocrat Interactive, a regulated online real money gaming. Aristocrat Leisure Limited was founded in 1950 and is headquartered in North Ryde, Australia.
Open the full interactive analysis →
Similar stocks
Frequently asked questions
Is Aristocrat Leisure Limited (ARLUF) undervalued?
What is the fair value of ARLUF?
What is the quality score of ARLUF?
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.
Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.