Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

0125 (0125) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$77.5M

0 0125 0125 · HK
PriceHK$0.2950
Fair ValueHK$0.1400
Upside-52.5%
Quality50/100
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.1200 – HK$0.1600

Fair value as of: Jul 1, 2026

From 3 valuation models · updated today

Share price −4.8% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.4100 HK$0.2950 Fair Value HK$0.1400 Jun 2025 Jun 2026

12‑month range HK$0.2950 – HK$0.4100 · fair‑value band HK$0.1200 – HK$0.1600 · the HK$0.2950 price screens above the HK$0.1400 fair value. As of Jul 1, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

0125 (0125) currently trades at HK$0.2950, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.1400 — implying the stock looks roughly 52.5% overvalued today. We read business quality at 50/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 0125 generated revenue of HK$841M at a net margin of -4.9%. Revenue grew 3.0% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -6.5%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$109M. Fundamentals as of Jul 1, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$841M
Revenue growth (YoY) +3.0%
Net margin -4.9%
Return on equity -6.5%
Free cash flow −HK$77.0M FY2025
Operating margin -6.8%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.1600
EPS growth (YoY) -86.0%
Net cash HK$109M FY2026

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 1, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2022 – FY2026 · reported fiscal years

0125 reported revenue of HK$891M in FY2026 versus HK$877M in FY2022, a compound +0.4%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$45.9M in FY2026.

Revenue +0.4%/yr
FY22 HK$877M
FY23 HK$705M
FY24 HK$702M
FY25 HK$828M
FY26 HK$891M
Net income
FY22 HK$9.1M
FY23 −HK$30.6M
FY24 −HK$28.4M
FY25 −HK$32.2M
FY26 −HK$45.9M

Is 0125 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Luxury Goods stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 1, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne, LVMUY $117.17 $80.70 -31%
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions HESAY $202.49 $92.81 -54%
Compagnie Financière Richemont SA CFRHF $221.58 $164.77 -26%
Christian Dior SE CHDRY $127.13 $150.70 +19%
Titan Company TITAN ₹4,305 ₹972.23 -77%
Kering SA PPRUF $318.73 $86.83 -73%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 0125 (0125) undervalued?
As of Jul 1, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.1400 versus a price of HK$0.2950 — about −53% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 0125?
Our model-based fair value for 0125 is HK$0.1400 (as of Jul 1, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.2950.
What is the quality score of 0125?
0125 has a Quality Score of 50/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 0125 (0125)?
0125 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$841M (latest available figure, as of Jul 1, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 0125?
The net profit margin of 0125 is about -4.9%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.