0264 (0264) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$1.1B

0 0264 0264 · HK

PriceHK$2.22

Fair ValueHK$2.95

Upside+32.9%

Quality52/100

Evidence: Low Range HK$2.71 – HK$3.31

Fair value as of: Jul 1, 2026

From 3 valuation models · updated today

Share price −5.9% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$1.13 – HK$3.19 · fair‑value band HK$2.71 – HK$3.31 · the HK$2.22 price screens below the HK$2.95 fair value. As of Jul 1, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

0264 (0264) currently trades at HK$2.22, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$2.95 — implying the stock looks roughly 32.9% undervalued today. We read business quality at 52/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 0264 generated revenue of HK$59.3M at a net margin of -26.4%. Revenue grew 211.2% year over year. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$1.5M. Fundamentals as of Jul 1, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$59.3M

Revenue growth (YoY) +211%

Net margin -26.4%

Free cash flow −HK$18.9M FY2025

Operating margin -22.0%

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0200

More key figures

Net cash HK$1.5M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 1, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

0264 reported revenue of HK$59.3M in FY2025 versus HK$49.2M in FY2021, a compound +4.8%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$15.7M in FY2025.

Revenue +4.8%/yr

FY21 HK$49.2M

FY22 HK$56.0M

FY23 HK$30.3M

FY24 HK$22.0M

FY25 HK$59.3M

Net income

FY21 −HK$21.0M

FY22 −HK$18.9M

FY23 −HK$27.9M

FY24 −HK$17.1M

FY25 −HK$15.7M

Is 0264 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Footwear & Accessories stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 1, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
NIKE, Inc NKE	€38.41	€31.09	-19%
adidas AG ADDYY	$97.66	$62.93	-36%
ASICS Corporation ASCCY	$25.77	$19.43	-25%
Deckers Outdoor Corporation DECK	$108.96	$96.18	-12%
On Holding ONON	$38.00	$18.63	-51%
Zhejiang China Commodities City Group 600415	¥11.37	¥23.62	+108%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 0264 (0264) undervalued?

As of Jul 1, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$2.95 versus a price of HK$2.22 — about +33% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 0264?

Our model-based fair value for 0264 is HK$2.95 (as of Jul 1, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$2.22.

What is the quality score of 0264?

0264 has a Quality Score of 52/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 0264 (0264)?

0264 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$59.3M (latest available figure, as of Jul 1, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 0264?

The net profit margin of 0264 is about -26.4%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.