2130 (2130) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$944M

2 2130 2130 · HK

PriceHK$3.14

Fair ValueHK$1.07

Upside-65.9%

Quality53/100

Watch 2130 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.8100 – HK$1.34

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 26 valuation models · updated today

Share price −6.2% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$2.93 – HK$3.48 · fair‑value band HK$0.8100 – HK$1.34 · the HK$3.14 price screens above the HK$1.07 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2130 (2130) currently trades at HK$3.14, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$1.07 — implying the stock looks roughly 65.9% overvalued today. We read business quality at 53/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 2130 generated revenue of HK$3.0B at a net margin of 0.5%. Revenue grew 1.6% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 4.1%. Net debt stands at HK$233M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$3.0B

Revenue growth (YoY) +1.6%

Net margin 0.5%

Return on equity 4.1%

Free cash flow HK$80.7M FY2025

P/E ratio 62.8

More key figures

Operating margin 2.4%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0500

Dividend yield 0.6%

EPS growth (YoY) -17.1%

Net debt HK$233M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2130 reported revenue of HK$3.0B in FY2025 versus HK$2.7B in FY2021, a compound +3.0%/yr. Reported net income was HK$15.4M in FY2025, compounding −34.5%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +3.0%/yr

FY21 HK$2.7B

FY22 HK$2.8B

FY23 HK$2.1B

FY24 HK$2.7B

FY25 HK$3.0B

Net income −34.5%/yr

FY21 HK$83.4M

FY22 HK$86.6M

FY23 HK$48.3M

FY24 HK$32.0M

FY25 HK$15.4M

Is 2130 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Integrated Freight & Logistics stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
FedEx Corporation FDX	€279.20	€124.00	-56%
United Parcel Service, Inc UPS	$107.24	$104.49	-3%
Deutsche Post AG DPSTF	$60.85	$139.20	+129%
DSV DSV	kr 1,540	kr 1,188	-23%
DSDVF DSDVF	$236.04	$108.35	-54%
DSDVY DSDVY	$116.93	$102.87	-12%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2130 (2130) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$1.07 versus a price of HK$3.14 — about −66% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 2130?

Our model-based fair value for 2130 is HK$1.07 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$3.14.

What is the quality score of 2130?

2130 has a Quality Score of 53/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 2130 (2130)?

2130 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$3.0B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 2130?

The net profit margin of 2130 is about 0.5%, meaning it keeps roughly 0.5% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 2130 pay a dividend?

2130 currently shows a dividend yield of about 0.63% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.