8537 (8537) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$57.6M

8 8537 8537 · HK

PriceHK$0.1600

Fair ValueHK$0.1300

Upside-18.8%

Quality56/100

Watch 8537 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.1100 – HK$0.1300

Fair value as of: Jul 3, 2026

From 21 valuation models · updated today

Share price −15.8% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.1308 – HK$0.3098 · fair‑value band HK$0.1100 – HK$0.1300 · the HK$0.1600 price screens above the HK$0.1300 fair value. As of Jul 3, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

8537 (8537) currently trades at HK$0.1600, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.1300 — implying the stock looks roughly 18.8% overvalued today. We read business quality at 56/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 8537 generated revenue of HK$154M at a net margin of 2.4%. Revenue grew 30.9% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 3.7%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$1.1M. Fundamentals as of Jul 3, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$154M

Revenue growth (YoY) +30.9%

Net margin 2.4%

Return on equity 3.7%

Free cash flow HK$9.4M FY2025

P/E ratio 16.0

More key figures

Operating margin 6.0%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0100

EPS growth (YoY) +294%

Net cash HK$1.1M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 3, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

8537 reported revenue of HK$135M in FY2025 versus HK$102M in FY2021, a compound +7.3%/yr. Reported net income was HK$500K in FY2025.

Revenue +7.3%/yr

FY21 HK$102M

FY22 HK$107M

FY23 HK$137M

FY24 HK$142M

FY25 HK$135M

Net income

FY21 −HK$280K

FY22 −HK$7.7M

FY23 −HK$2.2M

FY24 HK$1.6M

FY25 HK$500K

Is 8537 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Luxury Goods stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 3, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne, LVMUY	$110.33	$105.81	-4%
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions HESAY	$202.49	$92.81	-54%
Compagnie Financière Richemont SA CFRHF	$221.58	$164.77	-26%
Christian Dior SE CHDRY	$125.90	$151.73	+21%
Titan Company TITAN	₹4,260	₹1,546	-64%
Kering SA PPRUF	$318.73	$86.83	-73%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 8537 (8537) undervalued?

As of Jul 3, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.1300 versus a price of HK$0.1600 — about −19% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 8537?

Our model-based fair value for 8537 is HK$0.1300 (as of Jul 3, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1600.

What is the quality score of 8537?

8537 has a Quality Score of 56/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 8537 (8537)?

8537 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$154M (latest available figure, as of Jul 3, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 8537?

The net profit margin of 8537 is about 2.4%, meaning it keeps roughly 2.4% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.