Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Sleep Cycle AB (SLEEP) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · SE · Market cap 497M SEK

Pricekr 24.65
Fair Valuekr 52.48
Upside+112.9%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range kr 38.28 – kr 65.60

Fair value as of: Jun 25, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Sleep Cycle AB (SLEEP) currently trades at kr 24.65, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is kr 52.48 — implying the stock looks roughly 112.9% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Technology sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Sleep Cycle AB (publ) engages in the development of sleep analysis applications in Sweden and internationally. It offers Sleep Cycle, an application that provides sleep-related solutions, including smart alarm, sleep stages and aid, and sound recordings; and Luma, an AI-driven sleep coach. The company was incorporated in 2001 and is headquartered in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Sleep Cycle AB (SLEEP) undervalued?
As of Jun 25, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of kr 52.48 versus a price of kr 24.65 — about +113% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of SLEEP?
Our 21-model fair value for Sleep Cycle AB is kr 52.48 (as of Jun 25, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is kr 24.65.
What is the quality score of SLEEP?
Sleep Cycle AB has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.